ROUSCH (PAKISTAN) POWER LIMITED versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH CHIEF COMMISSIONER
Section 33 and Constitution 48 of Constitution of Pakistan, Section 9 duties9 Constitution of the Constitution Required for the Recovery of Duties and Penalties Applicant's Protective Documents, Sub-Registrar, Under Section33 of the Stamp Act, 99 of99 of, Money in the Account Was imposed because of an alleged lack of. The registration fee against the applicant's company documents, under section 33 of the Stamp Act, 1899, was in charge of the public office, apart from the police officer, in whose opinion any device was capable of duty. In the performance or performance of his duties, if it was found that such device was not sealed, the 33rd was not empowered to sub-registrar, that the applicant company Due to lack of documents submitted by, the registration fee related to the year rar 2008 of registration was not in accordance with the Sub-Registrar's Unknown Action Stamp Act, 99999999, if any money was recovered from the applicant. Sub Registrations, which were registered in 2008, due to a lack of registration fees in relation to the Company's security documents. The applicants may take action against the company pursuant to section 48 of the Stamp Act, Section 48 of 1899. The Stamp Act, 1899, authorized the collector to furnish such documents by way of collection of all duties, fines and dues, etc., or by the sale of the movable property of the person from whom the stamp act was in 1899. The sub-registrar of was not authorized anywhere. In 2010 the company applying for registration was not lasting in the eyes of the law and the legal process
