Section 496 8; 498 The Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 353/337 H (2) / 186/34 to prevent a public servant from performing his duties; In view of the obstruction of public works to the public servants, the court had considered the FIR and rejected the bail plea before the arrest of the accused, which was different for which the accused had sought bail. Explained that the injunction was passed under a misconception that was the result of a validity judge of ignorance. The court below dismissed the accused's bail plea by considering various FIRs and no word / reason was discussed about the FIR in which the accused sought bail. The explanation offered was unsatisfactory, but the ruling was still rejected, resulting in some misunderstanding, combining the facts of two different cases, and not of any other consideration. Was placed and the request for bail before arrest was considered that the accused's statement is pending before the court below, which was directed That he approved of the new law.
