SYED AURANGZAIB-UL-HASSAN versus FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION THROUGH CHAIRMAN
R 6 (iii) (d) and (e) Federal Public Service Commission Ordinance (XLV of 1977), Section 7 (3) Civil Superior Service (CSS) Examination Seats Applicant's Position as a Immigrant to K ??? In the year of submission of the Applicant's State Subject Certificate in the CSS Examination and assigning Information Group on successful completion of Information in the year ??? in Was held at specific seats. At the time of his appointment, upon refusing to accept the applicant's request by the Commission to allocate professional groups on the basis of the JJK State Subject after he became aware of the CSS Qualifying Examination in 2004. Providing the details, the public servant should be very careful when enrolling in government job, it is claimed by an applicant in his service career that the applicant will be considered final in the year 2008. n The CSS Examination could not claim a redistribution of the professional group on the basis of AJ & K's domicile based on the Punjab Appellant's Domicile, which they claimed applied for the CSS Examination in the year. But was allowed to change his domicile and then allocated. Based on this, it would be equivalent to granting him a license to claim change by another professional group to seniority, professional groups, and his appointment at any stage, resulting in a disagreement with other jobs. In principle, the High Court dismissed the appeal. \ r \ n
