OCEAN PAKISTAN LIMITED versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF LAW AND JUSTICE
Sections 127 and 130 (4) of the Constitution of Pakistan, Articles 199, 8, 9, 10A and 175 of the Retention Notice for the Recovery of the Income Tax Company (Applicant) prayed that Section 127 of the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 And 130 (4), were the ultra-wires of Arts 9, 10A and 175 of the Constitution and were responsible for the collision and unconstitution. Until the conclusion of the disputed tax liability through an independent tribunal beyond the tax classification, authorities should be prevented from collecting the tax from the company, and that the notification notice be suspended during the approval of the present application and the authorities should be banned. The validity company failed to take any drastic action against the company at Article 8 of the Constitution in connection with the Income Tax Ordinance 2001 company violations, challenging the wires of the said ordinance after eleven. (11) In the years following its declaration, it was objected that the High Court could not, in its constitutional jurisdiction, exclude the proceedings initiated on any law mandate in order to avoid the obligation to pay income tax, in particular. When the aforementioned law itself provided its remedy. Petitioners' constitutional request was rejected in the circumstances
