Section 497 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 409, 419 and 109 of the Prevention of Corruption Act (III of 1947), Section 5 (2) criminal breach of trust by a public servant, fraud by a person, surety guarantee , Accused of denying that he had secretly used his co-accused to misuse, buy and sell copies of question papers, to enter university tests, the accused was named in the FIR and his He was charged with misconduct and a lawsuit was filed after his co-accused. The accused found guilty of the offense was charged with Section 409, PPC and Section 5 (2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947, which, as a guarantee, falls under the prohibited clause of section 497, c. The CPC prosecution witnesses were standing on their statements before the police under Section 161. CP0 and the accused had failed to disclose any misconduct or counter-motive by the prosecution on the basis of their false allegations in the case, leading to the case of the accused, who had already been granted bail. Was found, the accused once committed two additional court confessions before the University Inquiry Board, and then did not behave as the accused and co-accused by presenting an affidavit in his own handwriting and signature before the police. ? Not only did the university suffer a huge financial loss but it also damaged the reputation and reputation of the institution, which led to thousands of students from all over the country encouraging such hateful crimes in society, arresting the accused. Later, the bail was pre-arrest and accordingly was dismissed
