Sections 497 (XLV of 1860), Sections 409, 419 and 109 of the Prevention of Corruption Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) of the Universities of Punjab and the Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education, XXII of 1950 (XXII of 1950) , Section 3, guilty of breach of trust by a public servant, fraud of publication, pleading guilty, denying the accused with his co-accused, for selling enough money when he sold the university entry exam question paper. After the accused was specially designated in the FIR, his case was registered when after proper inquiry, Mum was charged with the prohibition clause of Section 497, CRPC, and denying bait in such cases was a rule and acceptance was an exception in which the accused was charged with a felony offense. Failure to identify any specific feature of the case which may have brought him the case in an exception and not only did he suffer further damages along with the co-accused, caused a loss of Rs 40 million to the university but Causing mental distress and distress for students and their parents. These accusations led to the cancellation of the entry test, which ended the valuable academic year of the students and also affected the credibility of the university. The record states that the suspect's involvement was due to malpractice or negligence by the complainant or that the police partner was released on bail but the matter was suspected - Punjab University and the Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education The Malpractices Act, 1950, applied to the province of Punjab, but the accused's lawyer
