Section 9 (c) Drug Control (Government Analyst) Rules, 2001, R 4 Appraisal of evidence for drug arrest and trafficking Sentencing for analysis Suitable interpretation The trial court found the accused guilty in Section 9 ( C). The Control of Narcotic Substance Act, 1997 alleges that out of the five packets containing five kilograms of heroin, only 1 gram of heroin from each packet was sent for analysis, which is a violation of the law and Not enough. According to Rule 4, 2001 of Accreditation of Drug Substances (Government Analysts), it was necessary to send the appropriate quantity of the drug to the nearest testing laboratory, the simplest explanation of which quantities could be analyzed. They can report. The quantity of the subject was the intoxicating authority which did not object to the amount of narcotics during the chemical examination. Since it was irrational or irrational, the allegations made no attempt to seek the chemical investigator for the entire case. The record shows that the accused never challenged the fact that the substance recovered was heroin, and that technical grounds and scientific distinctions could not be made to any effect. The accused accused did not establish any misconduct against the complainant police officers, the trial court passed the verdict based on the documents and material available on the evidence, the accused's appeal was dismissed and the trial court's decision upheld. had gone.
