The prosecution's charges against Articles 249 A & 561 A Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Articles 503 and 506 criminal intimidation (applicant) were that it threatened to seize property belonging to the complaining company. Was. That he threatened the company with ties to influential people, and he forcibly tried to enter the company premises. Police changed sections 452 and 511, 5506 with PPC, while also submitting the invoice of the PPC accused, he was told that he had no evidence. Based on the statements of the prosecution witnesses in respect of Section 6506, PPC, when filing a final report under CRPC, section 452, in connection with the prosecution witness statements regarding the alleged commission of the crime to link the alleged commission of the crime. And deleted 511, PPC. Neither evidence was available on the record nor did it originate from the story narrated in the FIR, the components of the criminal threat described in Section 503, PPC were not available in the present case, no on record Evidence was not available, which could be the basis for the prosecution's acquittal. It is not only useless to proceed before the trial court but also to misuse the process of law according to which the petition was allowed.
