Find a Lawyer

AZAD HAFEEZ LTD. THROUGH TOOR JAN, F.B.R., ISLAMABAD versus CHAIRMAN, F.B.R. ISLAMABAD

The constitutional jurisdiction of Articles 199 and 174 High Court scope petitioner sought Mamdus' writ against customs authorities for the release of goods held at the port. According to Article 174 of the Constitution, the Federation had to either file a lawsuit or sue against it. The name of Pakistan and the province can be sued or sued in the name of such province applicant; Was unsuccessful. Was maintained at the Karachi port and for this reason the applicant had to take action within such territorial limits. And so, the High Court lacks territorial jurisdiction to decide on the matter, dismissing the constitutional petition if it is not enforceable.

Related judgments — Islamabad, 2012

• ALI HAIDER v. MUBARAK DIN KHAN 2012 YLR 1598
• MUHAMMAD FAWAD v. STANDARD CHARTERED BANK (PAKISTAN) LIMITED 2012 CLD 1633
• MUHAMMAD ASLAM DAR v. FAZAL UR REHMAN KHAN NIAZI 2012 MLD 1662
• SUMMIT BANK LTD. through Authorized Officer/Attorneys v. FARHAD 2012 CLD 1675
• SHANDAR PETROLEUM/CNG through Managing Partner v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Ministry of Petroleum 2012 CLD 1714
• PERVEZ AKHTAR RAJA v. State 2012 PCrLJ 1777
• TASHFEEN QAYYUM v. MAGISTRATE (SADDAR) ICT 2012 PCrLJ 1806
• ANJUM MUBASHAR MUGHAL v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, ISLAMABAD 2012 PCrLJ 1817

All Islamabad judgments of 2012 →

top advocate from Swabi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes