Find a Lawyer

SHANDAR PETROLEUM/CNG THROUGH MANAGING PARTNER versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM

Arts 158 and 172 Islamabad Capital Territory (Administration) Order (18 of 1980), Article 2 Natural gas, is preferred for a province to meet its needs with such headquarters in its area, and other provinces ( Provinces). Or any other priority given to any province specified in Article 158 of the Constitution of the Islamabad Capital Territory Judgment, Article 3 of the Constitution cannot be given to any other province or federal government. The Constitution provided for in the manner cannot be extended by judicial decision, but for that purpose nothing can be added to the constitution or any other law intended to interpret constitutional provisions by the President. Executive Capital of the Capital Territory of the Capital Capital Territory in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa This cannot be equated with the federal government's position as this area will not mean that no Article Article of the Constitution has given priority to the principles of Capital Territory Islamabad.

Related judgments — Islamabad, 2012

• MUHAMMAD FAWAD v. STANDARD CHARTERED BANK (PAKISTAN) LIMITED 2012 CLD 1633
• MUHAMMAD ASLAM DAR v. FAZAL UR REHMAN KHAN NIAZI 2012 MLD 1662
• SUMMIT BANK LTD. through Authorized Officer/Attorneys v. FARHAD 2012 CLD 1675
• AZAD HAFEEZ LTD. through Toor Jan, F.B.R., Islamabad v. CHAIRMAN, F.B.R. ISLAMABAD 2012 MLD 1684
• PERVEZ AKHTAR RAJA v. State 2012 PCrLJ 1777
• TASHFEEN QAYYUM v. MAGISTRATE (SADDAR) ICT 2012 PCrLJ 1806
• ANJUM MUBASHAR MUGHAL v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, ISLAMABAD 2012 PCrLJ 1817
• SAJJAD AHMED v. State 2012 YLR 1828

All Islamabad judgments of 2012 →

famous supreme court advocate from Sheikhupura lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes