Find a Lawyer

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/ WEALTH TAX, ISLAMABAD versus RAMIZ-UL-HAQ

Article 27 (1) (4) Appeal to the Tribunal for reference to a question of law arising out of its order without appealing to the High Court = In the absence of issuance of notice of refusal or denial of the Tribunal. Will not be born. The applicant of such application did not adopt a legal procedure so that the tribunal failed to adopt the proper procedure for referring the High Court party, no relief could be obtained from the High Court outside the bounds of the law, the appellant himself. Sitting on his rights, therefore, was not entitled. Relief in claim, for which the law-giver did not cooperate, court dismisses appeal

Related judgments — Islamabad, 2012

• KING CLOTHING v. MUHABAT KHAN 2012 CLC 939
• The BRANDS through Muhammad Arshad v. RENT CONTROLLER, ISLAMABAD 2012 CLD 957
• COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/WEALTH TAX, COMPANIES ZONE, ISLAMABAD v. DREAMLAND MOTELS (PVT.) LTD., ISLAMABAD 2012 PTD 976
• FIVE STAR BUILDING MATERIALS AND GEN. ORDER SUPPLIERS v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Islamabad 2012 PTD 999
• SHAHAB-UD-DIN v. ZUBAIR ASLAM 2012 MLD 1002
• PAKISTAN ORDNANCE FACTORIES (POF) WAH, CANTT. v. COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, SALES TAX AND CENTRAL EXCISE ADJUDICATION), ISLAMABAD 2012 PTD 1016
• MUHAMMAD KHUSHAL v. CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY through Chairman, C.D.A., Islamabad 2012 CLC 1063

All Islamabad judgments of 2012 →

when you need a advocate from Washuk lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes