THE BRANDS THROUGH MUHAMMAD ARSHAD versus RENT CONTROLLER, ISLAMABAD
Article 17 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Appeals Withdrawal Requests Exclude residents from evacuation by a landlord company having no letter of authority / resolution with the Board of Maintenance Tenant (any applicants) Was suspended while ordered to do so. The premises tenant believed that the landlord was a private limited company and the eviction request was filed by a company secretary who had no transfer letter that stated that the evacuation request was valid The landlord had filed a removal request, but at the same time the request was not granted. The contractor approved by the board of the landlord company was attached. The constitutional petition did not even mention whom the removal request was filed by, and that the landlord was not authorized by any contractor. Authorization was granted by the board, even though the person did not sign the petition. The evacuation letter produced during the evidence by which the withdrawal request was auto-filed was actually issued by the person through whom the withdrawal request was filed and on the basis of such letter during the proceedings Only one witness was empowered to state in evidence, saying that the letter was not a resolution was not being approved by the Board of Landlord's Company. In the circumstances, the orders of the lower courts were placed before the High Court. However, it was observed that the landlord was required to file a new evacuation application in accordance with the law, rules and regulations. Will have the right to Procedures, and that
