Find a Lawyer

PAKISTAN ORDNANCE FACTORIES (POF) WAH, CANTT. versus COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, SALES TAX AND CENTRAL EXCISE ADJUDICATION), ISLAMABAD

Sections 11 and 36 (1) 4 12 were actually passed on Order 25 2 2004 after the issuance of the showcase in 2002 to use or use the supply of amortization within the time specified by law. Which must be approved within 135 days, including an extension. In the period of waste / such order was approved with a delay of 318 days of 448 days of showcase notice, which was clearly banned from extending the time received on 20 11 2003 so no delay. Reasonable justification was not shown Government departments cannot be banned. In the case of a limitation, the order was withheld in the circumstances in which it would be considered to act within the law period.

Related judgments — Islamabad, 2012

• COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/WEALTH TAX, COMPANIES ZONE, ISLAMABAD v. DREAMLAND MOTELS (PVT.) LTD., ISLAMABAD 2012 PTD 976
• COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX/ WEALTH TAX, ISLAMABAD v. RAMIZ-UL-HAQ 2012 PTD 992
• FIVE STAR BUILDING MATERIALS AND GEN. ORDER SUPPLIERS v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Islamabad 2012 PTD 999
• SHAHAB-UD-DIN v. ZUBAIR ASLAM 2012 MLD 1002
• MUHAMMAD KHUSHAL v. CAPITAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY through Chairman, C.D.A., Islamabad 2012 CLC 1063
• SAEED AHMAD v. Mrs. REHANA ZAHID 2012 MLD 1072
• Sheikh MUHAMMAD TAHIR v. State 2012 PCrLJ 1075
• Mian MUHAMMAD AJMAL v. Syed NAZAR HUSSAIN SHAH BUKHARI (deceased) 2012 CLC 1088

All Islamabad judgments of 2012 →

list of supreme court advocates from Muzaffargarh lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes