SALMAN ASGHAR versus SPECIAL JUDGE RENT CONTROLLER, LAHORE
A. XXI, Rr 97, 98, 99, 100 & 101 and Section 144 West Pakistan Civil Rent Restriction Ordinance (VI VI 1959), Section 13 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Applicants Relief of Termination of Tenants There was a dispute. The order was approved by the Supreme Court and the rental controller was obliged to issue notices before passing the order in connection with the door-to-door closing and locking, requesting restoration of the possession of the rental property by the rental controller. Source was excluded. In the civil petition, the Supreme Court, which was rejected by default, but later the rent controller, in default of the restoration, issued possession warrants during the restoration and the possession of the disputed property was handed over to the landlord. The decree-holder may apply if the court, with respect to the resistance or obstruction of possession of the property, is in favor of the decision of the person against the judgment of the person in respect of the harassment of the immovable person from the immovable property for the possession of the property. Was expelled. The property may then be appealed in connection with such settlement if the court is satisfied with the request, then the order in respect of its restoration may be passed. The property was in their own account or due to someone else who was other than the decision maker. The applicants were claiming the right on the basis of sub-tenancy from the original decision-makers and the provisions of AXXI, Rr 97 to 101, were not attracted to the CPC. In the present case, the applicants were not entitled to resumption of occupation as they were enjoying the status quo before restoration of the order.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
