Evidence was appreciated for the purposes of fraud, using sections 468 and 471 of the Foreign Act (XXXI of 1946), sections 3 (a) (b), 13 and 14, as fake documents. The charges were imposed under Section 14 of the Foreign Act 1946. On the charge that he entered Pakistan on a fake passport, he was not a citizen of Pakistan, no evidence was produced by the prosecution against the accused, which could prove that he was not Pakistani and illegally. Was living in Pakistan, the court did not hear the case. Obtain Identity Card Of The Accused And Her Parents From Nadra Nadra had confirmed that the identity card issued to the accused and his parents were all genuine computerized identification cards, issued in favor of the accused and his parents Had admitted that the NADRA trial was not canceled by the court. The decision of the investigating officer's sole evidence and the alleged confessional statement of the accused before the FIA authorities cannot be confused with the value of the crime of confession before the police and the confession before the FIA, especially when the accused. The prosecution denied it failed to prove the charges against the accused under Section 14 of the Foreign Act. In 1946, the convictions of the accused under sections 468 and 471, PPC, were set aside, while retaining the sentence, the same was already mentioned in the jail roll.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
