The 42-year-old lunatic suit filed by the next friend plaintiff challenged the transfer of his property through his brother's registered sale deed because the attorney-plaintiff claimed he was insane at the time of the execution of Power of Attorney. On the basis of which the transfer was made. The property was made through the sale and was thus invalid, the trial court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, which the appellate court had ruled in favor of the tenant before filing the case. The plaintiff was sued by the attorney and before the trial, the shopkeepers were removed from the ranks of the prosecuting lawyers, and the lawyers were removed from the plaintiffs' row, which means the shopkeepers In addition to the powers of the attorney, the sale agreement was entered into by default. If the power of attorney and the sale agreement were not recognized in favor of the seller, then no one as a party without implementing them. Order cannot be enforced, results recorded by trial court by e-trial court cannot be sustained Yes, the appellate court rightly rejected the same amendment request.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
