Section 302 (b) conviction of evidence by Qatil, reduction of FIR was immediately recorded in the police station when the FIR of the incident was issued within two hours of the incident, delayed postmortem prosecution It was not suspected that the presence of the prosecution witnesses at the location of the incident (the petrol station), where the victim was working at the relevant time, cannot be doubted because both the prosecution's witnesses, who were the victim's real brother, There was no prejudice to the victims who went to the petrol station to provide food for the witnesses. Or for the purpose of falsely involving the accused in a trial. He remained consistent on every material point of view and did not indicate any contradiction or improvement in his statements, saying the relation of the witnesses was not enough to declare them as interested witnesses and accused. First there was enough light for each other. Available at the scene of the incident, there can be no false identification in this case, as long as the witnesses briefly described the incident as far as the time, place and location were concerned, the ocular account presented by the prosecutor, trusted. And reliable medical evidence fully supported it. The Account Account Prosecutor was able to prove the case against the accused through an Accular Account, even in the absence of recovery of vacant matters and the weapons of the crime, the prosecution proved beyond any doubt against the accused, and the trial court Section 2302 (b), the PPC Complainant, after more than three years, made some improvements in the months of the incident to strengthen the motive, presenting no independent witness
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
