The accused was arrested on the charge of committing rape, refusing to delay the Section 497 Prevention Code (XLV of 1860), section 376 rape, and requested that the FIR be filed It's been ten days late. The defendants did not provide any notable explanation against the suspect, who filed the FIR ten days after he allegedly appeared because he had been collected for perjury but was satisfactorily delayed. It was clarified that in the relevant time the parents of the minor victim were not at home and went to another district to earn their living, leaving the victim in the custody of another person with whom the accused was sentenced to 25 years imprisonment. And it came under the prohibition clause of section 497 (1). , The CRPC is refusing to withhold bail, especially when the defendants failed to deal with further investigation. In the circumstances, the bail was dismissed. \ R \ n \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
