Section 13 and O XI, R1 foreign judgment suit, case for bank loan recovery, Plaintiff's bank supplied the plaintiff on the basis of an order passed by the foreign court against the same defendant and the same plaintiff. Filed a petition in favor of A. XI, R 1, CPC will inquire into the legal status of the plaintiff bank, all questions will be placed before the plaintiff bank by the respondent regarding the evidence, which will be headed by the plaintiff, if not the plaintiff. If the bank chooses to lead the evidence in relation to the actual cause of action, then the plaintiff is entitled to examine the plaintiff's testimony and to examine and challenge any document that he may present and submit the proposed questions to such witnesses. However, neither party had the right to serve as an inquiry to ascertain the facts based on the evidence of the parties. Defendant's questions fall into this category Defendants should wait for a trial so they can put such questions to the testimony of the plaintiff if the latter chooses to present evidence because of the current proceedings. It is currently inappropriate for the defendant to offer a proposed inquiry to the plaintiff's bank.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
