A. XXXVIII, Rr 5 & 6 of the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Sections 12, 39, 42 and 54 of the specific performance of the contract, the cancellation of the documents, the declaration and the rule before the adjudicator were decided by the defendant against the defendant. Filed a case. The property was purchased by the claimant who did not transfer the possession of the property to the claimant and, before the judgment, before the trial of this case, it was claimed that the defendant had sued the third party on a suit property lease. Was granted, the crucial factor for the attachment before the judgment was that the relevant defendant intended to delay, defeat, or otherwise dispose of the property with the intention of discouraging the third party from acquiring the property. But it cannot defeat the rights and interests of the plaintiff (if any). If she will eventually be able to file a case for the delivery of the judgment and decree, then the defendant clearly made a promise and confirmed the factors against the provision of interim relief by attachment before the judgment. was done
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
