Sections 9 and 22 Convened Evidence (10 of 1984), Arts 48, 65, 74 and 76 Recovery of a Bank Loan on the basis of a Chartered Accountant Effect suit prepared by a Chartered Accountant filed by the Bank. I was given the decision. Banking Court After examining the bank statistics, after passing the table data and concluding in the Chartered Accountant's report, observed that the accounts were fully reviewed by the Chartered Accountant, Had worked in every detail in detail. The bank's three account transactions held by the defendants and such data were not disputed by the international court during cross examination, the banking court added, adding that for the purposes of accounting, box-of-accounts and The registers' entries were in accordance with Arts 74 consistent. After extensive scrutiny of the Chartered Accountant, the validity of the law testimony, Val 1984 Val Val ended, in which the law came in the parameters of Articles 48 and 65 of the evidence, the 1984 Bank Chartered Accountant observed and concluded in its report. Failure to identify any error, nor was there any illegal identification of judgment or decree. Through the Banking Court, which was otherwise based on the correct reading of the evidence of the High Court's Division Bench and the correct principles of law in the appeal of the High Court, the judgment and decree passed by the Banking Court did not find any error. I was based on the report. As an expert, while neither the bank nor the defendant could cite any document or evidence that could possibly be decided
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
