Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AZEEM ALIAS DODO versus STATE

Section 13 (e) proof of having an unlicensed arm was appreciated approximately 8 days, but was received with information received after about five months in the division, for which there was no explanation on the daily diary record copy, Under which the police allegedly went to the recovery site, the accused was not produced. In the central murder case was acquitted, while the prosecution failed to prove the accused against him, giving him the benefit of the doubt, the accused was acquitted.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012

• KAREEM BUX v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh 2012 PLC(CS) 160
• ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, NABISAR SUB-DIVISION v. MANZOOR AHMED 2012 MLD 164
• Dr. AISHA YOUSUF v. KHALID MUNEER 2012 PLD 166
• MUHAMMAD JAMAL v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2012 YLR 167
• HABIB BANK LIMITED v. RAFIQ AHMED 2012 CLD 170
• Mrs. RUKHSANA YASMEEN (YAHYA) v. NAZAZ ALI 2012 MLD 171
• SHOUKAT alias SHAFQATULLAH v. State 2012 PLD 174
• WESTERN SHOES COMPANY through Partners v. SEVEN STAR GOODS TRANSPORT COMPANY 2012 PLD 177

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2012 →

jobs for fresh advocates from Timergara lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes