The delay in the trial of the 497 Criminal Procedure Code (XLV of 1860), Article 302/34 murder convictions, the joint intention was that more than four years had passed but the case had not proceeded till date. Could grow. That the delay was not due to the accused, and that the High Court had directed the trial court to withdraw the trial within three months and to attend to the prosecution's witnesses through stringent measures, but despite such directive The trial was not yet over. A valid examination of the trial court's diary sheet revealed that the delay was not attributed to the accused, despite the direction of the High Court, the trial of the case had not yet ended and the accused was jailed for more than four () years. Was behind bars. Confessed that the accused had not previously been convicted of the death penalty or life imprisonment or that he was a harsh, frustrated or dangerous criminal, or had committed a terrorist act. He could be sentenced to death or life imprisonment. The basis for the delay in the end of his trial
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
