Section,,, (c) and the definition of evidence for trafficking and trafficking of 25 drugs, the lack of a lawyer's offer for the convicted, accused, meant that there were no private advisers or passengers connected to the bus covered. Was or was not made a witness. The Drug Substances Act, 1997 clearly provided that for purposes of search and arrest in drug cases, the provisions of section 103, CR PC were not applicable even otherwise, police personnel There were competent witnesses, like independent witnesses. And his testimony could not be simply dismissed on the grounds that he was a police employee, the statements of the prosecution's witnesses remained constant despite the length of the material, which they had long been inspected, by the defense witness. Nothing was revealed from which the accused was the driver. Under the bus, while the co-accused was his cleaner and marijuana was also recovered from the bus's secret caves, there was no doubt about conscious possession and illicit information in this case, according to the prosecution's story, one kilogram The 110kg slab was recovered from secret palms, and one kilogram of each slab was separated from each bag to be sent to a chemical inspector, which showed that only 6kg of chemical for chemical testing Was sent for testing, although it is positive, but according to the description of the articles in the parcel, six printed plastic water cups. TM, each kg of dark gray slab tiger water was sent to was planted in plastic of course 110 just six slabs chemical inspection of each kg of hashish in slab and do not know the
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
