Find a Lawyer

FAREED ALAM versus SHIRAZ AFZAL MALIK

Section 13 Return of Court Fees, Appeal for Respondents in the Appeal filed by the Applicant was never served nor was there any lawyer involved, and no restriction on behalf of the Applicant / Applicant by the Court The restraining order was not approved. A compromise was made between the parties under which the applicant / appellant withdrew the appeal at an early stage. The application was allowed pursuant to the provisions of section 13 or not

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012

• MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM v. State 2012 MLD 1318
• BACHAL v. State 2012 PCrLJ 1324
• SHAHOOR AHMED SIDDIQUE v. Mst. ZUBAIDA BEGUM 2012 CLC 1329
• AVARI HOTELS LIMITED v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Information and Broadcasting 2012 CLD 1330
• HAYAT GHANI v. State 2012 YLR 1336
• NAVEED JAN BALOCH v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Commerce 2012 CLD 1339
• ABDUL HAFEEZ v. State 2012 YLR 1340
• BAKSHOO v. State 2012 PCrLJ 1342

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2012 →

advocates from Buchay Key lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes