SYED SHARIQ HUSAIN versus PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT SINDH
Section 392 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Sections 154, 156 and 157 investigated the transfer of the robbery, the complainant filed an FIR, but no inquiry was made, and the investigation was transferred to the Crime Branch Police and the same was inspected. , Handed over to the Crime Branch. , Inspector Crime Branch submitted a report under A Class to the Magistrate within three days, without having to inspect the scene of the incident and record the witnesses' statement, with the directive to terminate the investigation within seven days. According to the Bombay Presidency Police Guide, since the day Sindh was part of the Bombay Presidency Investigation Officer, according to the Bombay Presidency Police Guide, according to the Bombay Presidency Police Guide, there was a lack of evidence under one class. Can be accepted, which proved that the Investigation Officer was unaware of the scope of the A class. In the present case, it was requested that the witnesses were not available, summaries being presented. The arguments and the investigating officer came under the purview of actionable exercise. No reasons were cited, dismissed as having no legal sanctity in the eyes of the law
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
