Section 497 (2) of the Explosives Act (VI of 1908), Sections 3, 4 and 5 of the Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Section 7, is intended to cause explosives and to make explosives or Attempts to seize and bail out the Terrorism Act, further approval rely heavily on inquiry medical reports, through prosecution, to show that the suspect suffered injuries due to the explosion, but said the report was not submitted if it was also called That if the report was submitted, even at the bail-out stage, it could not be attributed to the accused. He was not arrested on the spot and was later removed from the blast site. And they, too, may have been injured on the body of the accused for any reason, and could not be temporarily involved in a home explosion when identified by the other accused, when the accused's contact with the explosion, when the evidence (of the bail). At this stage) was not required to consider the matter and / or preferably praised, the accused not to be held guilty of this offense and to be charged under Sections 3, 4 of Section 497 of the PC The demand is made under the provisions of PC (2). The Explosive Material Stances Act, 5 and 5 of 1908 shows that anyone involved in possessing explosives and possessing explosives with the intention of making life and property and / or explosives was found, Such incidents will be punished. No explosives, no explosives were made and neither was detained at the site of the explosion to show that he was engaged in making explosives and suffered injuries due to the explosion. f Further investigation, the accused on bail
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
