MRS. SOHAILA SHAHZAD versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY M/O INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
Article 199 Constitution Petition Civil Service Appointment, Exchange and Termination of Service The applicant was appointed to a unit of the corporation in Grade E1 and was promoted to Grade E2 and then to Grade E3, resulting in some subsidiary companies The employer merged into the corporation and, under the control of the chairman, his applicant was transferred to one of the permanently merged companies and he accepted the transfer permanently and said that the transfer without any objection After joining the company, the transfer company terminated the applicant's services and said that the applicant Submission of the report was submitted to the parent corporation from which they were transferred, but they were not legally allowed to enter the corporation's legal services rules and there was a question as to whether the applicant was permanently Was moved to, by which any claimant may claim. Services by the corporation, where there were no terms and conditions, are governed by legal rules, but only by rules, instructions or instructions issued by the institution or institution in which the applicant was employed. The infringement can be enforced by a constitutional petition, in view of the fact that there were no legal rules and regulations in this regard, the applicant's complaint was his individual complaint, which was decided only by his merits. , If the employer takes an adverse action in violation of the laws, The process may be implemented in the constitutional jurisdiction. If there were no laws, then the owner
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
