Find a Lawyer

IDREES versus STATE

As a result of the denial of record, Section 497 Contempt Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 2302 / e 34 conviction general intention, it was found that the accused was fully connected with the commission of the crime, the decision of the trial. The court had to. After recording the evidence it can be ascertained whether the victim was killed or assaulted with his weapon and the accused reacted in his defense. The gun was recovered from the possession of the accused at the time of his arrest. There was no case for further investigation; the bail application was rejected.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012

• AMIR BUX alias PAPOO v. State 2012 MLD 647
• ABDUL HAMEED v. State 2012 PCrLJ 653
• IKRAMUL HAQ v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary, Revenue Department 2012 CLC 655
• SHAKEEL AHMED SHAIKH v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary, Sindh 2012 PLC(CS) 657
• MUHAMMAD IMRAN BUTT v. State 2012 MLD 665
• HABIB-UR-REHMAN v. State 2012 YLR 665
• FAISAL v. Mrs. KHALIDA BANO 2012 CLC 667
• AMIR BUX v. State 2012 YLR 668

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2012 →

top advocate from Jandanwala lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes