Section 497 (2) of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Section 380/457/34/411 Theft in a residential home, misdemeanor or breaking into a house, in the guilt of guilt, in general, dishonestly stolen. Acquiring the property guaranteed, without further investigation principles consistent with the incident that he was charged with theft at the complainant's shop, which on the basis of which the accused was convicted of the crime The footprints were trapped at the defendant's residence. The suspects were that the original theft was held without notice. That the footprints were proof of a weak type. That some of the stolen articles were tied to it. That the highest offense under Section 411, the PPC, was made against him, which did not fall within the prohibited clause of Section 497, the CRPC, and that the co-accused had been granted bail and his The matter was like a joint indictment. Allegation of theft was not disclosed Prima was charged with possessing stolen articles only, Section 1111, could be punished under PPC, pursuant to the Prohibited Clause of Section 749 of The CCP accused, on a similar charge, was granted bail. No need for further investigation was one of the case inquiries and accordingly the accused was admitted on bail.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
