PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION COMPANY LTD. versus ANWAR TEXTILE MILLS LTD.
Failure to present witness suits filed by the claimant, trial court and lower appellate writ of deposition, possession and damages, for declaration of OVI, R1 suit, under Articles 12 and 42 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908). The court had simultaneously ruled in his favor. The plaintiff plaintiff company claimed that the lawsuit filed by the plaintiff was barred by the defendant and that the claim made by the plaintiff was that the defendant company did not present any evidence, therefore, its defense A written statement was filed by the validity party, if no witness was presented. In support of this, the party could not rely on the contents of such written statement, which had to be observed, such defendant had no right to present his defense; it was a written statement that was taken into consideration. And not defense. Plaintiff Company Was Attacked Plaintiff can defend the defendant by examining the witnesses' testimony and relying on the evidence contained by PL. As the plaintiff's case was barred by time and restriction, the High Court refused to go to the suits of the High Court under the jurisdiction of the appeal, leaving the concurrent decision passed in favor of the plaintiff. And the second case was dropped. Appeal was allowed in the circumstances
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
