Section 497 Preventive Regulation (XLV of 1860), Section 365B / 452/34 abduction, forcing a woman to abduct or for marriage, etc., preparation of injury, assault or wrongful restraint, guarantee of general intent The FIR's contents denied that the suspect had been assigned a specific role and that he was present at the scene of the incident and that he had complained about his weapon to the complainant and the other person in the house. The accused helped his co-accused get away with the alleged abductor (the complainant's wife). ) From the complainant's house, which shows that all the accused, with joint intent, entered the complainant's house with the sole intention of abducting the alleged abductor and stated the facts of the incident and The suspect named the complainant was told in the FIR that he was held by the accused and co-accused in the false hope that they would release the kidnapper, and this was the only time they had been released from him. Denied that he had filed an FIR and that the complainant had reluctantly filed an FIR against the accused and the co-accused persons. The delay in filing Alan was explained and one of the co-accused was shown a fugitive version which was fully supported in his statement under Section 161, two witnesses, the alleged abductor of the PC was not recovered. The accused was involved in a felony and there was no reasonable basis for understanding that the accused was not involved in the crime, according to which the accused's request for bail was dismissed. n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
