Section 3 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Complaint filed by the defendant by the applicant filed against the illegal disposal of the property by the plaintiff / complainant, Section 200 Criminal Procedure, trial court Was removed by an inappropriate order as reported. The defendant purchased the property from the complainant through a seller's agreement which was rejected by the complainant but it appears that the matter is of a civil nature, which only the civil court can resolve, according to the trial court's complaint. Did not pass on the question. The trial court overruled the relevant provisions of this Act and sought to find out the allegations of illegal and forcible disposal such as those filed under Section 3 of the Illegal Settlement Act, 2005. Did not try to determine if the alleged offense was established within the parameters in this case. An Act may not be properly investigated or investigated as required under the Illegal Disposition, for the fact of the N Act, 2005, or for any other kind of complaint, even though the defendant's contract of sale by the complainant was disputed. That, while the complainant's father had a contentious document about his land, the complainant was not prevented from maintaining both civil and criminal proceedings, both legally and legally, for the trial court to know It was binding whether the complainant established the charge under the Illegal Disposition Act 2005 Or, whether they be related to the sale in this case. The settlement agreement can be dealt with by a civil court, the trial court said
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
