The trial court's jurisdiction, upheld, for the purposes of maintaining a compromise request relating to sections 345 (2), 345 (5) and 345 (7) of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), section 338E. The agreement between the parties was sentenced to life imprisonment. The trial court and his jail appeals filed before the High Court were also dismissed and their conviction was upheld, followed by the parties seeking a compromise and settlement agreement under Section 4545, CRPC. Before being transferred, the trial court returned jurisdiction to appear before a competent court. It is argued that no matter is pending in the trial court's file in view of the bar under sections 345 (2) and 345 (7), CRPC validity section 345 (2), provided that the CRPC provided These crimes should be further enhanced. Prior to the court's approval, there is no pending litigation for such a crime, which clearly means that the Trial Court, Section 338E, PPC, made it clear that all questions related to the waiver or the compounding These cases should be decided by the trial court before or after the first pass, therefore, for all practical purposes and under the mandate of the law, it was only a trial court that had all the questions related to the formation of a waiver or offense. Should determine. At the time of any appeal hearing, without the leave of the court, no criminal proceedings could be allowed, before the appeal was to be heard, the accused's appeal was dismissed and The sentence was upheld, therefore, only after the appeal was dismissed did the trial take place. Tell the court this
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
