MUHAMMAD IDREES versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE
Annexes I and III to the Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 199, 4, 9 and 25 Maintaining the Constitutional Appeal Cantonment Service Upgrade Denial of Influence of Fundamental Rights, Impact Authorities Partially Implementing Office Memorandum for Classification of Clerical / Auditors What. Instead of implementing it solely in a test, it is in their own wishes to determine whether the legal entity was a 'person' in the sense of Article 199 of the Constitution, and the position of the applicants was that Discrimination was not promoted through promotion of positions and was used arbitrarily by arbitrary authorities and arbitrarily entitled to national pay scale according to government policy, such as the Pakistan Cantonment Servants Rules 1954. Provided in the Annex, the cantonment boards must comply with government policies Research was under. From time to time ti was disregarded by the authorities under the nullity of Article 25 of the Constitution, in which it was presumed that equal rights of persons should be given equal protection of privileges and privileges. I am given the right to be treated equally. Or in the case of discrimination and any deviation, this process of authority / legal workers may be challenged before the High Court under Article 199 of the Constitution of the State, legal entities and legal corporations to work strictly in accordance with the law. Was needed. This process was open to reform of the constitutional jurisdiction of the superior judiciary, beyond matters of authority, the abuse of powers or the colorful use of powers by such workers, the authorities
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
