Complaint / FIR on the basis of Section 497 Criminal Procedure Code (XLV of 1860), Rules 420/468/471/109 of fraud, use of fake document bail as a fake document, fraud, etc. The denial of the allegations against the accused, as well as the documentary evidence as well as the statements of the prosecution witnesses under Section 161, was substantiated by the CCP accused, who had suffered substantial financial loss to the bank prima facie account holder. The accused was contacted by the IR, who was allegedly contacted by the commission. Crime and it seems that there is no unusual situation for the accused to take discretion. On reasonable grounds it is believed that the accused was guilty of a crime defined under the Banking Tribunals Ordinance, 1984, which was related to the offenses in relation to the banks. And may not be the same as cases run under PPC. And he was also a beneficiary of the alleged transaction, which involved a large sum of money. The accused's case was related to the case of the co-accused and the principles of consistency were not taken into account in the case of the accused. Had gone
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
