Sections 497 (2) of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 114, 147, 148, 149 and 337H (2) of a convicted AMD and hurried or negligent act are granted bail, granting further investigation The name was not available in the FIR, along with complaint complaints, as well as assigning a role in the commission of the witness's testimony, stating that the accused was named, either by mistake or by police. Because of the ignorance of And since he was not present at the time of the incident on the relevant date, both the witness and the complainant had taken an oath of affidavit, two participants who had filed an FIR for the offender's guilt, By swearing the affidavit, it was shown in these circumstances that the matter of further inquiry, especially when the other 18 accused were absconding. And the fact is that the FIR itself did not appear for the accused. It was alleged that a case was filed for bail under Section 497 (2) of the Act. CCP, under the circumstances, was admitted to bail.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
