MUMTAZ ALI JAHANGIR versus PROVINCE OF SINDH THROUGH SECRETARY, (REVENUE), KARACHI
Applicants requested from Article 3 Constitution Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Petition, claimed that they were legal allotments of the house in the dispute, but they were forcibly disposed of without issuing any notice, officials alleged. The petitioners also presented an allotment order along with the memo. The petition was a fake and fabricated document, various documents filed by the authorities made it clear that their comments, along with a separate statement, also showed that the applicants were in illegal possession and Sindh Public Property ( Following the appropriate procedures envisaged under the Termination of Elimination) Act, 1975, action was taken against the applicants in accordance with the law. Initially, the constitutional request was transferred by the applicant to whom the legal Not having the character or the looks standing, they could challenge the authorities' action on the only ground that The house was never allotted. For the applicant and it was wrong to ask, the High Court's jurisdiction over the constitutional application is that the applicant should be a grieving person and to avail himself of such jurisdiction he must have a standing view and There were serious controversial questions of fact in this case, and the applicants claim that the allotment order was genuine. Such a dispute cannot be decided in the constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court, especially where equally effective, reasonable and alternative. The treatments were fairly straightforward for applicants. Such as the filing of a complaint under the Illegal Disposition Act, 2005, or any lawful law
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
