Find a Lawyer

HAKIM ALI versus BAKHSHOO

Section 324/337 H (2) / 337 F (i) / 114/148/149 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 417 (2A) Attempt to commit a Ummah, which was hurt, overpowered, deadly. Injuries from armed rioters were not obtained with the help of medical evidence to explain the evidence against the Armed Conflict Arms Eviction, with the prosecution's witness being the suspect at the scene of the incident. Did not support aerial firing. The complaining party's investigating officer and the recovery witness did not mention the recovery of any crime left vacant, the prosecution had failed to prove the accused, according to the trial court's appeal against acquittal. Was deleted

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012

• Malik PAHAR KHAN v. State 2012 YLR 435
• INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BANK OF PAKISTAN v. TRANSMISSION ENGINEERING INDUSTRIES (PRIVATE) LTD. 2012 CLD 436
• BILAL v. VITH A.D.J. (South), Karachi 2012 YLR 438
• SHAMSUDDIN v. PAKISTAN BAIT-UL-MALL 2012 PLC(CS) 447
• FAYAZ AHMED v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Senior Member Board of Revenue 2012 YLR 449
• MOBIN RAFIQUE v. RASHID AHMED 2012 PLD 449
• PAKISTAN HERALD PUBLICATIONS (PVT.) LTD. v. KARACHI BUILDING CONTROL AUTHORITY 2012 CLD 453
• MUMTAZ ALI JAHANGIR v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary, (Revenue), Karachi 2012 YLR 453

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2012 →

advocate for immigration from Liaquat Pur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes