Find a Lawyer

ZAFAR IQBAL versus STATE

Section 13 (d) Appreciating Proof of Unlicensed Arms There was no major contradiction or contradiction in the prosecution's evidence, but the length of the prosecution's testimony was cross-examined, but nothing was found for the accused. Was arrested and the arrest of the accused was carried out in strange hours. No public witnesses could be available at night and at the time of the National Highway. The prosecutor had, without any reasonable doubt, proved his case against the accused. The accused in his statement under section 234 under has no hostility. What was also not presented by CRPC. Appeal for dismissal of evidence of prosecution with no evidence to qualify the accused

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012

• MOBIN RAFIQUE v. RASHID AHMED 2012 PLD 449
• PAKISTAN HERALD PUBLICATIONS (PVT.) LTD. v. KARACHI BUILDING CONTROL AUTHORITY 2012 CLD 453
• MUMTAZ ALI JAHANGIR v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary, (Revenue), Karachi 2012 YLR 453
• Inspector MUHAMMAD BASIR KHAN v. MANAGER, ALLIED BANK, KARACHI 2012 PLD 461
• Malik SAFDAR ALI v. Syed KHALID ALI 2012 PLD 464
• ANWAR AND COMPANY through Manager/Attorney v. SINDH INDUSTRIAL TRADING ESTATES LTD. 2012 YLR 466
• HAZOOR BUX v. State 2012 PLD 469
• UNITED BANK LIMITED v. EXIM INTERNATIONAL 2012 CLD 471

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2012 →

tax advocates from Hub Inds Estate lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes