Find a Lawyer

SHAH MEHMOOD ALIAS SHAHU versus STATE

Section 497 (2) Control of the Narcotic Substances Act (XXV of 1997), Sections 6 and 9 (b) Possession of intoxicating bail, a further FIR inquiry grant reveals that the drugs allegedly recovered were one and a half The kilogram prosecution confirmed that the allegedly recovered substances were never weighed in preparation for the consultant's delay when sending samples for analysis was not specified. The question is whether the amount of 500 grams normally exceeds the upper limit of 1000 grams? It was not yet determined whether the accused's case was a borderline case between Sections 9 (b) and 9 (c) of the Control of Narcotic Substances Act, 1997 and further investigation was needed in terms of section 497 (2), The CR suspect was admitted on bail, under the circumstances

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012

• MUHAMMADUDDIN v. State 2012 PCrLJ 1388
• MUHAMMAD IBRAHIM TONIO v. State 2012 YLR 1391
• ABDUL QADIR JANGDA v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through the Secretary, Ministry of Interior 2012 MLD 1401
• SHAHID MAZHAR v. SHADMAN COTTON MILLS LIMITED 2012 CLD 1402
• MAQSOOD AHMED MEMON v. HYDERABAD ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY (WAPDA), HESCO 2012 PLC(CS) 1408
• PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary Sindh v. MUHAMMAD SADIQ 2012 CLC 1409
• SABIR BAIG v. State 2012 YLR 1412
• NASEEM OILS through Proprietor v. M.T. MIRAMIS through Master/Chief Officer 2012 CLD 1413

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2012 →

advocate for immigration from Hyderabad lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes