Articles 302 (b), 148 and 149 Qatil-e-Azad, complimenting the evidence, said that six injuries to the vital body parts of the body, according to the doctor, were the cause of the deceased's death, medical evidence confirmed the alleged incident from the FIR. It is learned that the accused was armed with hatchet and repeatedly assaulted the deceased, there was no contradiction in the statements of the prosecution regarding the incident and injuries on the body of the victim. Are. The three witnesses in the court were inconsistent as long as their statements feared minor contradictions, there was no result, which could not have led to the suspicion of the prosecutor's motto, which involved a murder case with the accused party. Was. It turned out that the criminal recovery of the weapon, which was a hatchet from the accused, was merely proof of the facts and facts of recovery or recovery could not be decided. Particularly in this case when the accused's weapon was accused of being hatchet as far as the accused's character was concerned, no material improvement was made when the prosecution proved beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was the victim. Was found guilty of repeated blows when he was injured in a firearm with a firearm and lied after being injured. The role of the co-accused was similar to that of the accused, the charges were the same, the weapons were the same and the wounds were the same. The Daily Entry did not result in non-production of the deceased in the same section of the Appeals of the accused and the accomplices. The other partner has been charged in relation to fire his gun against the accused when he said that the co-accused police party went to his home
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
