Section 426 Prevention Code (XLV of 1860), section 452 / 337A (i) / 337A (ii) / 337A (iii) / 337L (2) / 337F (vi) injury, house after preparation for attack There was a court hearing in connection with the disturbing or inaccurate ban, the Shuja'i caliphate, the Shujaah modiha, the Shuja'i Hashima, others injured, and so on. Since all of the prosecution's witnesses were irrational and interested witnesses, their testimony could not be grounds for wrongful conviction without the evidence of independent evidence. That the general charges were laid against the accused and that no specific role was attributed to him. That the trial court had acquitted the accused and the accused in connection with the robbery, for which they could not be sentenced under section 452, PPC, and if convicted under section 452, They can often be sentenced to a lesser degree or instructed to pay compensation. The Trident concluded that neither robbery nor robbery was committed by the accused and the accomplices, therefore, they could not be punished under Section 452, PPC no. The specific role of the accused was assigned, but the co-accused was assigned with a special character. The accused remained on bail during the trial. A counter-lawsuit was registered against the complaining party, in which case the trial court He was acquitted, but the appeals against him were complained by the High Court complainant that if the appeal against the acquittal and the present appeal were heard simultaneously, it would be appropriate, but it would remain intact. Prospects, future appeals and the possibility of a verdict were far-reaching.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
