In sections 2?2 (b) and ???at quilting, the disappearance of evidence of a crime or the failure to give evidence to a screening offender, the value of any close associate or independent witness was not listed in the evidence. The alleged complainant had gone with the complainant No consultation had been prepared for the recovery of the dead body at the appointed time FIR was lodged on the spot 2 the day after the dead body was recovered 9 9 Was missing from 2005, but no FIR was filed until 15 9 2005. No chemical report was presented which could indicate that any blood stains PRO Land was collected. And human blood was found, since all of the prosecution's witnesses are relatives of the complainant, their possibility of interest cannot be ruled out, especially in cases where there was no witness to the murder. Except that the last time the evidence rehabilitation consultants were not free individuals, when the entire case was based on the last seen evidence, the evidence of the recovery counsel was doubtful and they were interested. The prosecution failed to prove this allegation. And had committed various errors while the evidence of the prosecution witnesses did not appear during the investigation of the case. The bill was reliable and neither the reliance nor the consistency of the accused to prosecute the accused can be denied, in which case the prosecutor failed to prove the case against the accused, on reasonable doubt. The culprits of the accused were sentenced, they were set at liberty. , Under the circumstances
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
