Section 497 of the Control of Narcotic Material Stances Act (XXV of 1997), Section 9 (C) possession of drug paraphernalia, denial of the accused, who was operating the rickshaw, was allegedly found in the possession of three kilograms of hashish. There are also allegations that the marijuana, allegedly recovered from them, was recovered from two kilograms of rickshaw and only one kilogram of hash was recovered from its exclusive personal possession, and this was a borderline case. The alleged charges were recovered, and that all the prosecution witnesses were police officers and interesting witnesses. The alleged involvement of the accused in the alleged crime was initially established by the FIR concept, the statements of the prosecution witnesses and the positive chemical report could not be charged. Put any kind of enmity or enmity of the police to prevent the raids on him. The argument of the allegation that only one kilogram was recovered from his special possession could not be excluded from the evidence of the police officials at the bail-out stage. Bail was denied, in the circumstances
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
