Section 2 302 / at34 Qatil-e-Amal, Evidence Testimony The benefit of the doubt was not seen in the incident as no one came forward to claim that he had seen the victim sprinkling petrol and setting fire to the witnesses, evidence of witnesses Are reliable. And the conviction of the accused was recorded without consideration of the other aspects of the case, which were in favor of the accused and could not be neglected lightly, the evidence of the witnesses was full of contradictions necessary to prove the crime. Evidence was needed, otherwise the innocent would be found guilty, another prosecution witness did not support the prosecution's case, and the prosecutor declared it hostile, and neither could the credibility of the prosecution's witnesses. And was neither credible nor influential to record the conviction of the accused. The court did not consider the delay nor discussed it for about five to five months in filing the FIR, while the case was to be sent to the police in case of murder, without delay, the prosecution's case was without doubt. However, the accused was convicted of trial trial, he was acquitted of the extension, he got the benefit of the doubt and he was released in the circumstances.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
