Find a Lawyer

MIRZA MUHAMMAD ASHRAF BAIG versus SALEEM ULLAH BAIG

Article 12 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 115 Law In Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 100 Suit Review for Specific Performance Joint Consequences Trial Court Rejects Trial Appeal Court dismisses plaintiff's claim that thirty years old document By seizing the sale contract land, the possibility of authenticity was attached to such a document as the plaintiffs failed to prove their case, except that the recent findings were immune to interference. Overall illegal proceedings or irregularities were floating at the level of decisions, revisions were excluded.

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015

• MUHAMMAD BAKHSH (DECEASED) v. AMANULLAH (DECEASED) 2015 PLD 445
• ILTAF HUSSAIN v. ZAFAR IQBAL 2015 CLC 447
• Qazi TEHMID AHMED v. SECRETARY MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM 2015 PLC(CS) 449
• MUHAMMAD IQBAL v. State 2015 YLR 450
• Mst. RUQQIA BIBI v. SPECIAL JUDGE, ANTI-TERRORISM COURT 2015 PCrLJ 456
• MUHAMMAD FAROOQ WAJID v. FPSC 2015 PLD 457
• UMER WADDA v. MUNIR AHMAD 2015 CLC 457
• SULTAN MUHAMMAD KHAN v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE 2015 PTD 458

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2015 →

immigration advocates contact from Theing Jattan More lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes