Section 4 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), A XXXVII, R 2 Suitable for Recovery on the basis of the Prohibition Tool Pro Note or Proof Byte filed by the plaintiff in favor of the trial court in favor of the trial court. Decision made. It was relied upon by the plaintiff and defendant against the defendant's documents which relied on the trial court to carry the signature of the minor witnesses, therefore, there was no supporting note and A restriction was to determine the nature of a device, whether the payment was promised, the best thing to do was to see what the parties intended and which device was generally accepted by the person to whom it was used. The car itself will consider how the device is described by the parties and nothing more, on any device. It must contain the promise of easy payment and the evidence presented by the plaintiff was trustworthy and reliable as the defendant was fully supportive of the evidence presented by the plaintiff, except under the defendant's pro note. The plaintiff was liable to pay Rs 100,000 and the trial court correctly answered the cases in favor of the plaintiff. The High Court refused to interfere with the decision and dismissed the appeal passed by the trial court. had gone.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
