QAZI TEHMID AHMED versus SECRETARY MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM
Article 3 and 12 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitution Maintenance Termination Simplicity Employer / Applicant's opinion was that although the service rules of Sui Northern Gas Pipeline Limited were not of legal nature, the applicant's services were subject to it. Can't delete. Said that the rules, rather it should be terminated under the Service (Special Powers) Ordinance 2000. The petition was uncontested; the applicant's appointment letter was specifically provided that the applicant's services would be operated under the rules and the suspension order also stated that the case was settled under simple rules. Expansion and removal of the term was not a matter of simplicity. Can be removed without any defamatory stain The RMS read the Service Agreement under Section 3 with Section 12 of the Ordinance which shows that the matters under which the Ordinance was dismissed were dismissed, dismissed. , Mandatory retirement, reduced rank or pay scale or one or more minor fines are imposed under section 3 of the Ordinance on specific grounds for public servants (talent and discipline) rules, 1973; Was also not dismissed or removed from employment due to the allegations, but it was extended to the trial period and dismissed simply. , Which was run under unconstitutional rules and not a constitutional application was dismissed by the ordinance. \ R \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
