MUHAMMAD AMIN versus JUSTICE OF PEACE/ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE, SAHIWAL
The petitioner challenged the earlier order passed by Justice of Peace, under which sections 22A, 22B, 154, 155 and 157 of the initial order of registration of the criminal case were challenged by the Department for recording the applicant's version. H was instructed that the respondent had withdrawn the earlier order of peace at the request of the Justice before the order was not baseless, but was conditional, if any commission of a cognizable offense was found to be made Yes. After that a criminal case should be registered that the order was withdrawn by an uncharacteristic order that no commission of any cognizable offense was made, therefore, to withdraw the earlier order. It was not enough once the permit was granted under the law. Through Justice of Peace, then without any reason, reason or justification, it was not a valid commission for review or dismissal, no admissible offense, no ground for conducting any proceedings, even ignorance. For the commission of the crime, the hearing proceedings were advised under Section 155, the PCR Justice of Justice under which the earlier order was withdrawn / reviewed, cannot be justified, and the law Was not acceptable in the eyes of, the inappropriate order was set aside
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
